Re: [Patch] mm tracepoints

[Ingo Molnar]

* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:38 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 18:10 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > Looks pretty good and useful to me. I've Cc:-ed more mm folks, 
> > > it would be nice to hear their opinion about these tracepoints.
> > > 
> > > Andrew, Nick, Peter, what do you think?
> > 
> > Bit sad we use the struct mm_struct * as mm identifier (little %lx vs %p
> > confusion there too), but I suppose there simply isn't anything better.
> 
> > Things missing, 
> 
> Why only anon and filemap, that misses out on all the funky 
> driver ->fault() handlers.

btw., does it include shm faults? I think all of this would be 
handled if the tracepoint was at handle_mm_fault(), right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/