Re: [v2 PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU

[Arun R Bharadwaj]

* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-03-05 16:14:51]:

> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 17:42:49 +0530
> Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > With the timers queued I measure the sleep state residency
> > for a period of 10s.
> > Next, I enable timer migration and measure the sleep state
> > residency period.
> 
> is your table in seconds? Because realistically, at least on PC like
> hardware, doing work to get sleep times over a 100 / 200 msecs or so
> isn't going to save you any amount of measurable power anymore...
>

Hi Arjan,

Yes, the table is in seconds.
Rather than looking at timer migration as a direct means of obtaining
power savings, I would like to see it as one of the mechanisms which
would aid in preventing an almost idle cpu from waking up
unnecessarily, thereby causing power penalty. Otherwise, there is a
chance of all the CPUs in a particular package being idle and the
entire package going into deep sleep.
So we cannot really get big power savings just by doing timer
migration alone.

--arun

> 
> 
> -- 
> Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
> visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/