Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support

[H. Peter Anvin]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> I think this is a bit misleading.  I think you can understand the true 
> differences between Xen and KVM by s/hypervisor/Operating System/. 
> Fundamentally, a hypervisor is just an operating system that provides a 
> hardware-like interface to it's processes.
[...]

> The real difference between KVM and Xen is that Xen is a separate 
> Operating System dedicated to virtualization.  In many ways, it's a fork 
> of Linux since it uses quite a lot of Linux code.
>
> The argument for Xen as a separate OS is no different than the argument 
> for a dedicated Real Time Operating System, a dedicated OS for embedded 
> systems, or a dedicated OS for a very large system.

In particular, Xen is a microkernel-type operating system.  The dom0 
model is a classic single-server, in the style of Mach.  A lot of the 
"Xen could use a distributed dom0" arguments were also done with Mach 
("the real goal is a multi-server") but such a system never materialized 
(Hurd was supposed to be one.)  Building multiservers is *hard*, and 
building multiservers which don't suck is even harder.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/