Re: [PATCH] x86: set_highmem_pages_init() cleanup

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tue Mar 03 2009 - 07:15:55 EST



* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Impact: cleanup
>
> This patch moves set_highmem_pages_init() to arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c. The
> declaration of the function is kept in asm/numa_32.h because asm/highmem.h is
> included only CONFIG_HIGHMEM is enabled so we can't put the empty static inline
> function there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h | 6 +++++-
> arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 12 ------------
> arch/x86/mm/numa_32.c | 26 --------------------------
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks!

One question:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
> index e9f5db7..a372290 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
> @@ -4,8 +4,12 @@
> extern int pxm_to_nid(int pxm);
> extern void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> extern void set_highmem_pages_init(void);
> +#else
> +static inline void set_highmem_pages_init(void)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
>
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_NUMA_32_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> index bcc079c..13a823c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/highmem_32.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/swap.h> /* for totalram_pages */
>
> void *kmap(struct page *page)
> {
> @@ -156,3 +157,36 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmap);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kunmap);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmap_atomic);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(kunmap_atomic);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> +void __init set_highmem_pages_init(void)
> +{
> + struct zone *zone;
> + int nid;
> +
> + for_each_zone(zone) {
> + unsigned long zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn;
> +
> + if (!is_highmem(zone))
> + continue;
> +
> + zone_start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> + zone_end_pfn = zone_start_pfn + zone->spanned_pages;
> +
> + nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
> + printk(KERN_INFO "Initializing %s for node %d (%08lx:%08lx)\n",
> + zone->name, nid, zone_start_pfn, zone_end_pfn);
> +
> + add_highpages_with_active_regions(nid, zone_start_pfn,
> + zone_end_pfn);
> + }
> + totalram_pages += totalhigh_pages;
> +}
> +#else
> +static void __init set_highmem_pages_init(void)
> +{
> + add_highpages_with_active_regions(0, highstart_pfn, highend_pfn);
> +
> + totalram_pages += totalhigh_pages;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */

Couldnt we just wrap the !NUMA case into the NUMA case and just
have the NUMA function present, by making for_each_zone() a
two-entries matter and making the second entry contain:

zone->zone_start_pfn := highstart_pfn
zone->spanned_pages := highend_pfn-highstart_pfn

?

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/