Re: lockdep and threaded IRQs

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 14:46 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:19:31 +0100
> 
> > I state that every !IRQF_DISABLED usage is a bug, either due to broken
> > hardware or broken drivers.
> 
> We'll send you the bill to have everyone's hardware
> replaced :-)

I'm not saying to remove support for such stuff, as long as we clearly
annotate that its due to broken ass hardware we can leave a IRQF_ENABLED
thingy in there.

Preferably such drivers would be converted to threaded interrupts, but I
thought Alan mentioned an IDE chipset that was so broken even that would
be impossible (could not mask the IRQ for it would corrupt stuff).

The thing I am strongly opposing though, is keeping interrupts enabled
for regular drivers on sane hardware.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/