Re: [PATCH 0/4] Memory controller soft limit patches (v3)

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:06:02 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Considering above 2, it's not bad to find victim by proper logic
>  from balance_pgdat() by using mem_cgroup_select_victim().
>  like this:
> ==
>  struct mem_cgroup *select_vicitim_at_soft_limit_via_balance_pgdat(int nid, int zid)
>  {
>      while (?) {
>         vitcim = mem_cgroup_select_victim(init_mem_cgroup);  #need some modification.

Another choice is that when a user set soft-limit via interface, add it to
our own private list and scan it here. (of course, remove at rmdir.)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/