Re: [PATCH] sched: kill unused parameter of pick_next_task()

[AmÃrico Wang]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 01:55:26PM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>based on tip/sched/cleanups
>
>impact: no change in functionality
>
>Parameter "prev" seems like an unusable thing.
>
>Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> kernel/sched.c |    6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>index 410eec4..57f8b12 100644
>--- a/kernel/sched.c
>+++ b/kernel/sched.c
>@@ -4512,7 +4512,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct *prev)
>  * Pick up the highest-prio task:
>  */
> static inline struct task_struct *
>-pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
>+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq)
> {
> 	const struct sched_class *class;
> 	struct task_struct *p;
>@@ -4587,7 +4587,7 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
> 		idle_balance(cpu, rq);
> 
> 	prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
        ^^^^^

How about this? :)

>-	next = pick_next_task(rq, prev);
>+	next = pick_next_task(rq);
> 
> 	if (likely(prev != next)) {
                   ^^^^

also here.

> 		sched_info_switch(prev, next);
>@@ -6423,7 +6423,7 @@ static void migrate_dead_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
> 		if (!rq->nr_running)
> 			break;
> 		update_rq_clock(rq);
>-		next = pick_next_task(rq, rq->curr);
>+		next = pick_next_task(rq);
> 		if (!next)
> 			break;
> 		next->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, next);


I think you should check the latest linus-git, where you can safely
just remove the parameter 'prev'.


-- 
Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations!
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/