Re: brk patches..

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Sat Feb 28 2009 - 15:40:26 EST


On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:17 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> wonder if boot loader check uncompress size aka vmlinux size in bzImage
>>> before it find one good position for bzImage...?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Jeremy's brk patches may break:
>> 1. kexec load 64bit vmlinux on some ram that near the memory hole etc.
>> blindly to use ram after _end may have some problem
>> 2. coreboot aka linux is using elf (by mkelfImage : vmlinux + initrd),
>> initrd became one section after _end...
>> could cause initrd get overwrite... by extend _brk
>>
>
> But its no different from what i386 does now to allocate its initial
> pagetables.  How does this not break now?
>

it will try to use initial page table af first, and it is not big
enough, it will according to e820 and other reserved_early areas to
find good positions.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/