Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.29-rc6 2/2] regulator: twl4030 voltageenumeration (v2)

[Liam Girdwood]

On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 12:39 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 27 February 2009, Liam Girdwood wrote:

> > Sorry, this didn't apply. It looks like I'm missing an earlier patch(s)
> > here. Could you regenerate this and your core patch against latest
> > for-next.
> 
> The regulator -next tree seems to be missing a bunch of stuff...
> I generated this patch against a "twl4030-regulator.c" which I
> extracted *from that tree* yesterday.  But today it's different.
> 
> In this case, the current code doesn't have the $SUBJECT patch,
> which at that time you had applied.  But it does have a small
> snippet from that "minor patch"...
> 
> 
> Color me confused.  Are you asking for a "v3" of $SUBJECT, or
> is the "v2" going to re-appear? 

Applied the "v2".

>  And when will that -next tree
> acquire the rest of
> 
>  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123567791402469&w=2
> 

Applied and re-based this one into original patch.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/