Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend

[Oliver Neukum]

Am Freitag 27 Februar 2009 11:18:18 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > We can just as well have a class of tasks less important than power
> > saving. They'd just run when power saving is not active for some other
> > reason. Just like other such schemes we end up with the problem
> > of priority inversion with locking.
>
> Ok, I guess this could be interesting in some cases... maybe. What are
> real examples of such tasks?

The classical example is Seti@HOME. Any monitoring tool like umtsmon
or kwifimanager.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/