correct locking in softirq

[Giacomo]

Good morning

Harald Welte's "The journey of a packet through the Linux 2.6.10
network stack" article says that packet travelling inside
linux kernel 2.6 (the receive / input part) runs in softirq context.

Hooking with netfilter's hooks in a kernel module, i need to read for
each packet received a list of rules.

Since in input and prerouting hooks the context is softirq (perhaps
also in forward?), I need some read lock
feature.

I currently use RCU lists and, while reading lists I use

READ

read_lock_bh()

together with list_for_each_rcu()

When changing, or flushing, rules, I use

WRITE

spin_lock() + list_add_tail_rcu() (adding)

or spin_lock() + list_for_each_entry() (for listing and then freeing
with list_del_rcu() and call_rcu() )

The question is:

- is the read part above correct? - do I really need _bh()? or should
I use simply read_lock() ?

Thanks in advance

Giacomo


-- 
Giacomo S.
http://www.giacomos.it

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

* Aprile 2008: iqfire-wall, un progetto
  open source che implementa un
  filtro di pacchetti di rete per Linux,
  e` disponibile per il download qui:
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/ipfire-wall

* Informazioni e pagina web ufficiale:
  http://www.giacomos.it/iqfire/index.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

 . ''  `.
:   :'    :
 `.  ` '
    `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
        http://www.debian.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/