H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But how does it break down between "static inline type\nfunction_name" andI believe that is the breakdown is roughly what you see above, i.e. over 8:1;
"static inline\ntype function_name"? That's more to the point.
the pattern I used was looking for "^static inline[^;(]*$", and a visual
examination of the results shows that even if my line count is slighly off the
lopsidedness is still dramatic.
Sorry, I meant:
"static inline type\nfunction_name" vs "static inline type function_name"