Re: [PATCH] aoe: error printed 1 too early

From: Ed Cashin
Date: Wed Feb 25 2009 - 12:09:53 EST


On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 02:38:54PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> with while (i-- > 0); i reaches -1 after the loop, so the test below is printed
> one too early: 0 still means success.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c
> index cc25057..eeea477 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoedev.c
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ skbfree(struct sk_buff *skb)
> return;
> while (atomic_read(&skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref) != 1 && i-- > 0)
> msleep(Sms);
> - if (i <= 0) {
> + if (i < 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR
> "aoe: %s holds ref: %s\n",
> skb->dev ? skb->dev->name : "netif",
>

You are talking about the case where, when entering the loop on the
"last chance" iteration, the states are,

atomic_read(&skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref == 1
i == 0

... in which case, the skb can and should be used but is not used
because after the value of i is tested it becomes -1.

Right?

Sounds like a good catch. Did you find it because you saw the "cannot
free skb" message?

--
Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/