Re: Another Performance Regression in write() syscall

[Dave Hansen]

On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:05 -0800, Salman Qazi wrote:
> Analysis of profile data has led us to believe that the commit
> 3d733633a633065729c9e4e254b2e5442c00ef7e has caused a performance
> regression.  This commit provides for tracking of writers so that read only
> bind mounts function correctly.
> 
> We can verify this regression by applying the following patch to partially
> disable the above-mentioned commit and then running the fstime component
> of Unixbench.  The settings used were 256 byte writes with MAX_BLOCK of 2000.

I'm a bit surprised that write() is what is regressing.  Unless I
screwed up, we do all the expensive accounting at open()/close() time.
Is this a test that gets run in parallel on multiple cpus?  

Could you take a look at Nick's patches to speed this stuff up?

	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/28186

We may need to dust those off, although I'm still a bit worried about
the complexities of open-coding all the barriers.

Could we also see some kind of profile?  What kind of machine are you
seeing this on, btw?

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/