Re: [PATCH] lis3lv02d: add axes knowledge of HP Pavilion dv5 models

From: Éric Piel
Date: Tue Feb 10 2009 - 18:17:38 EST


Giuseppe Bilotta schreef:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Giuseppe Bilotta
<giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, that patch. Not sure what to do next... you could grab lis3
manual and see if you can setup chip by hand to get better results...
As Eric pointed out, it looks definitely like an endianness problem,
although there are a few strange things which are happening at the
same time. Is the lis3 manual available online somewhere, or can I
request it to the mfgr?

'k, found it on the STMicroelectronics website. Reading the doc about
LIS3LV02DL I see that WHO_AM_I should return 3Ah, but my sensor
returns 3Bh. I'll see if I find the correct datasheet for this one
instead, it might have info about the differences.
Yeah, we accept also 3Bh for the who_am_i (see in hp_accel.c). The reporter who had a laptop with such chip never reported any problem and I didn't pay attention enough to notice those chips have only 8bits precision.

One thing that I noticed is that (modulo axis inversion) I'm able to
use the sensor correctly if I set the thing to only use the high byte,
totally discarding the lower byte:
return *((s8*)(&hi));
Maybe this sensor needs a different setup to return 12 instead of 8
bits of information.
So you probably have a lis202dl (which has only two axes of 8bits each) or a LIS302DL (3 axes of 8 bits):
http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/ds/13624/lis202dl.htm
http://www.st.com/stonline/products/literature/ds/12726/lis302dl.htm

Unfortunately, the WHO_AM_I register returns 3Bh in both cases. I'd tend to imagine it's a three axes chip, but you can confirm that by just checking if Z has any meaningful value. You can then modify lis3lv02d_read_16() to only return the byte as low byte and the high byte as FFh if the high bit of the value is set (because I guess they are signed integers). You also have to change MDPS_MAX_VAL to 128, to get things completely right.

Once we have this sorted, we should add a flag to know if the current device is 8 bits or 12 bits, depending on the value of who_am_i. This would allow the driver to work fine with both type of chip.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/