Re: [PATCH 002/002] de2104x: support for systems lacking cache coherence

[Risto Suominen]

2009/2/10 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Please prefer to prepare patches in `patch -p1' form:
>
> --- a/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig
> +++ a/drivers/net/tulip/Kconfig
>
I'll try to remember that.

> I think CONFIG_DE2104X_DSL is always defined if this driver is being
> compiled.  So the Kconfig `default' should suffice here?  In which case
> we can do
>
> #define DSL CONFIG_DE2104X_DSL
>
> and leave it at that.
>
> In which case we can do away with DSL everywhere and just use
> CONFIG_DE2104X_DSL here.
>
I was thinking of the case where someone just compiles without reconfiguring.

> But really, we shouldn't do this at configuration time at all.  It
> would be much better to do it at runtime, via a module parameter.
>
Well, yeah, but that would probably cost cpu cycles. At least it would
mean lots of changes.

> And it would be much^2 better to do it automatically, based upon the
> chip probing information or whatever.  That's probably hard.
>
I agree.

> Can remove the ifdefs here.  A zero-length array is OK, and will
> consume zero space.
>
I was uncertain whether this applies to all compilers. I kind of
remember opposite cases in the past.

Risto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/