Re: [PATCH 10/11] x86: make lazy %gs optional on x86_32

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hmmm... I was (lazily) trying to add that %gs can only be cleared if
> it's being managed lazily because otherwise it might be being used by
> the kernel for other purposes.  :-)
>
> Is my understanding correct?

Oh, hm, I see.  We only want to zero it if we're using lazy gs, 
otherwise it contains something useful...  I need to run now, but I'll 
look at it again in a few hours.

   J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/