Re: [PATCHv2] ACPI: add missing KERN_* constants to printks

From: Len Brown
Date: Sat Feb 07 2009 - 00:39:12 EST



applied -- though I changed the two in acpi_os_vprintf()
to be KERN_CONT, or we'd get a bunch of <4>'s in
constructed messages. Yes, we take our chances with SMP on those.

thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center

On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Frank Seidel wrote:

> From: Frank Seidel <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> According to kerneljanitors todo list all printk calls (beginning
> a new line) should have an according KERN_* constant.
> Those are the missing peaces here for the acpi subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/container.c | 5 +++--
> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@ static int acpi_video_bus_POST_info_seq_
> printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX
> "This indicates a BIOS bug. Please contact the manufacturer.\n");
> }
> - printk("%llx\n", options);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%llx\n", options);
> seq_printf(seq, "can POST: <integrated video>");
> if (options & 2)
> seq_printf(seq, " <PCI video>");
> --- a/drivers/acpi/container.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/container.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void container_notify_cb(acpi_han
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK:
> /* Fall through */
> case ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK:
> - printk("Container driver received %s event\n",
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "Container driver received %s event\n",
> (type == ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK) ?
> "ACPI_NOTIFY_BUS_CHECK" : "ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_CHECK");
> status = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device);
> @@ -174,7 +174,8 @@ static void container_notify_cb(acpi_han
> kobject_uevent(&device->dev.kobj,
> KOBJ_ONLINE);
> else
> - printk("Failed to add container\n");
> + printk(KERN_WARNING
> + "Failed to add container\n");
> }
> } else {
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
> return -ENODEV;
> } else {
> acpi_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] += PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
> - printk(PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
> + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
> acpi_device_name(link->device),
> acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);
> }
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
>
> ret = device_create_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_docked);
> if (ret) {
> - printk("Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> platform_device_unregister(dock_device);
> kfree(dock_station);
> dock_station = NULL;
> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
> }
> ret = device_create_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_undock);
> if (ret) {
> - printk("Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_docked);
> platform_device_unregister(dock_device);
> kfree(dock_station);
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static int dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
> }
> ret = device_create_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_uid);
> if (ret) {
> - printk("Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_docked);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_undock);
> platform_device_unregister(dock_device);
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,7 @@ static int dock_add(acpi_handle handle)
> }
> ret = device_create_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_flags);
> if (ret) {
> - printk("Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Error %d adding sysfs file\n", ret);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_docked);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_undock);
> device_remove_file(&dock_device->dev, &dev_attr_uid);
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -228,10 +228,10 @@ void acpi_os_vprintf(const char *fmt, va
> if (acpi_in_debugger) {
> kdb_printf("%s", buffer);
> } else {
> - printk("%s", buffer);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s", buffer);
> }
> #else
> - printk("%s", buffer);
> + printk(KERN_WARNING "%s", buffer);
> #endif
> }
>
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> @@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ static void acpi_power_off_prepare(void)
> static void acpi_power_off(void)
> {
> /* acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S5) should have already been called */
> - printk("%s called\n", __func__);
> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s called\n", __func__);
> local_irq_disable();
> acpi_enable_wakeup_device(ACPI_STATE_S5);
> acpi_enter_sleep_state(ACPI_STATE_S5);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/