Re: PATCH: Allow user to force 'tsc' to be treated as stable.

[Jiri Kosina]

On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Ben Greear wrote:

> Allow user to force TSC as stable clock-source. Works around BIOS issues 
> in the FWA-7304 (Via CN700 chipset) system, and possibly others.

How do you know that the TSC is stable on such system? What was the reason 
for kernel marking it unstable?

> diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> index ca89e15..0578fcb 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(clocksource_list);
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(clocksource_lock);
>  static char override_name[32];
>  static int finished_booting;
> +static int force_tsc_stable;
>  
>  /* clocksource_done_booting - Called near the end of core bootup
>   *
> @@ -82,6 +83,14 @@ static unsigned long watchdog_resumed;
>  #define WATCHDOG_INTERVAL (HZ >> 1)
>  #define WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD (NSEC_PER_SEC >> 4)
>  
> +static int __init parse_force_tsc_stable(char *arg)
> +{
> +	force_tsc_stable = 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("force_tsc_stable", parse_force_tsc_stable);

Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt would also like to know about this 
option.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/