Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb-serial : fix the nousb oops

From: Greg KH
Date: Wed Feb 04 2009 - 19:03:41 EST


On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 09:10:20AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> remove wgreathouse@xxxxxxxx in cc-list because this mail will be
> rejected by the smva.com email server.
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:43:04AM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 06:53:23PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> In case with "nousb" booting, serial drivers will trigger kernel oops.
> >> >
> >> > They will? What is the oops message?
> >>
> >> Yes, they will, at lease I saw usb_serial/aircable/ftdi_sio oops. I
> >> will manage to copy the oops message later.
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> Here add usb_disabled() check in usb_serial_init and usb_serial_register
> >> >
> >> > This is odd, is it something new? Why is usb-serial the only driver
> >> > that needs such a thing?
> >>
> >> No, it is not new thing. usb serial drivers normally call
> >> usb_serial_register first, then usb_register, usb_register will fail
> >> due to "nousb" checking, but usb_serial_register no.
> >
> > But as usb_register will fail, shouldn't they properly back out and no
> > oopses happen? This sounds like a simple fix to the drivers that are
> > failing here, not changing the usb-serial core.
>
> Hi greg
>
> I think all usb serial drivers which call usb_serial_register will
> oops, so IMHO usb core should be fixed.
>
> I think maybe you missed my another reply, copy the content here again.

No, I got it.

I'm more interested in why usb-serial is oopsing, as it should't be.

> ---
> hand copy part of the oops message:

Can you take a picture of the oops?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/