Re: [PATCH v2] ftrace: On PowerPC we don't need frame pointers forCALLER_ADDRs

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:32:18AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 19:19 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:06:45PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > [1] Btw, why exactly do we need the -fno-omit-frame-pointer for
> > "FUNCTION_TRCER" tracer? Why just -pg isn't sufficient?..
> > 
> 
> The problem is this that is in the toplevel Makefile:
> 
> 
> ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> else
> KBUILD_CFLAGS	+= -fomit-frame-pointer
> endif
> 
> 
> -pg is incompatible with -fomit-frame-pointer

Ah...

$ gcc -pg -fomit-frame-pointer -S c.c
gcc: -pg and -fomit-frame-pointer are incompatible

It's hard-coded in gcc, in the code that don't know about
architecture details.

But on PowerPC -O1 implies -fomit-frame-pointer, that is

gcc -pg -O1 -fno-omit-frame-pointer
and
gcc -pg -O1

produce different outputs. Thus -pg -O should be the same
as "-pg -O -fomit-framepointer".

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/