Re: [PATCH E 08/14] OMAP clock: move rate recalc, propagation code up to plat-omap/clock.c

From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Tue Feb 03 2009 - 08:18:37 EST


On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:13:02AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Based on a comparison of E 08 with the three omap-clks1 commits you
> mentioned above, here are some differences that would merit further
> attention. Some of these you've mentioned in subsequent E-mails.
>
> If you use your patches, I would suggest making the following changes:
>
> 1. "remove unnecessary calls to propagate_rate()" should keep the
> propagate_rate(&ck_dpll1) call in omap1_select_table_rate(), since this
> function is only used by struct clk virtual_clk_mpu. virtual_clk_mpu is
> farther away from the root of the clock tree than struct clk ck_dpll1.

Yes, that's the bug I was talking about in previous mails. Hence the
follow up questions on why this clock exists.

> 2. In plat-omap2/clock.c, clk_set_rate() and clk_set_parent() should call
> propagate_rate() after recalc.

If you look at "[ARM] omap: move clock propagation into core omap clock code"
you'll see this is already done after the respective methods are called.
However, in that patch it doesn't call the recalc method; that's a
separate change (see below).

> 3. Several internal calls to *_recalc() functions can be dropped -
> specifically, in omap2_reprogram_dpllcore(), omap2_select_table_rate(),
> omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(), and omap3_core_dpll_m2_set_rate().

That's what I extracted from and merged as E8:

2d0c7f5596e021f7065511b433d16dd081915a24
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.c
index 2ce8c02..4564ae3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock24xx.c
@@ -441,7 +441,6 @@ static int omap2_reprogram_dpllcore(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
omap2xxx_sdrc_init_params(omap2xxx_sdrc_dll_is_unlocked());
omap2xxx_sdrc_reprogram(done_rate, 0);
}
- omap2_dpllcore_recalc(&dpll_ck);
ret = 0;

dpll_exit:
@@ -570,7 +569,6 @@ static int omap2_select_table_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)

local_irq_restore(flags);
}
- omap2_dpllcore_recalc(&dpll_ck);

return 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
index 06a81fe..75eb254 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c
@@ -614,8 +614,6 @@ static int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
omap3_noncore_dpll_program(clk, dd->last_rounded_m, dd->last_rounded_n,
freqsel);

- omap3_dpll_recalc(clk);
-
return 0;
}

@@ -693,8 +691,6 @@ static int omap3_core_dpll_m2_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
sp->actim_ctrlb, new_div);
local_irq_enable();

- omap2_clksel_recalc(clk);
-
return 0;
}

diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
index 794849b..a166e2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c
@@ -140,8 +140,12 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags);
if (arch_clock->clk_set_rate)
ret = arch_clock->clk_set_rate(clk, rate);
- if (ret == 0 && (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES))
- propagate_rate(clk);
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ if (clk->recalc)
+ clk->recalc(clk);
+ if (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES)
+ propagate_rate(clk);
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags);

return ret;
@@ -159,8 +163,12 @@ int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags);
if (arch_clock->clk_set_parent)
ret = arch_clock->clk_set_parent(clk, parent);
- if (ret == 0 && (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES))
- propagate_rate(clk);
+ if (ret == 0) {
+ if (clk->recalc)
+ clk->recalc(clk);
+ if (clk->flags & RATE_PROPAGATES)
+ propagate_rate(clk);
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags);

return ret;
@@ -211,7 +219,7 @@ void propagate_rate(struct clk * tclk)
list_for_each_entry(clkp, &clocks, node) {
if (likely(clkp->parent != tclk))
continue;
- if (likely((u32)clkp->recalc)) {
+ if (clkp->recalc) {
unsigned long old_rate = clkp->rate;
clkp->recalc(clkp);
if (clkp->rate != old_rate &&

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/