Re: [git-pull -tip] fix headers_check warnings

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

[H. Peter Anvin - Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:49:14AM -0800]
| Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
| >>
| >> Hi Jaswinder,
| >>
| >> it seems we have a clash here :) I thought this part
| >> was just dropped out
| >>
| >> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/461
| >>
| >> and Peter had been applying it on tip:x86/header-fixes
| >>
| >> 	http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/549
| >>
| >> but maybe it's just lost...
| > 
| > No, you cannot remove sys_arch_prctl otherwise you will get sparse
| > warning like this:
| > 
| >   CHECK   arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
| > arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c:833:6: warning: symbol 'sys_arch_prctl' was not declared. Should it be static?
| > 
| 
| Perhaps we can just move this prototype to <asm/syscalls.h>.
| 
| 	-hpa
| 
| -- 
| H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
| I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
| 

Hmm...

For internal use we refer to do_arch_prctl and
sys_arch_prctl supposed to be syscall wrapper.

Yes, Peter, you're right! It seems this call
was missed there.

		-Cyrill-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/