Re: [PATCH] mfd: Fix TWL4030 build on some ARM variants

[David Brownell]

On Friday 30 January 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> Many ARM platforms do not provide a mach/cpu.h so rather than guarding
> the use of that header with CONFIG_ARM guard it with the guards used
> when testing for the OMAP variants in the body of the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
> index e7ab003..68826f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
>  #include <linux/i2c.h>
>  #include <linux/i2c/twl4030.h>
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3)
>  #include <mach/cpu.h>
>  #endif
>  
> -- 
> 1.5.6.3
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/