Re: [PATCH 07/13] dmaengine: introduce dma_request_channel andprivate channels

[Atsushi Nemoto]

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:16:05 -0700, "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think, there is a problem with your dma_request_channel() /
> > private_candidate() implementation: your current version only tries one
> > channel from a dma device list, which matched capabilities. If this
> > channel is not accepted by the client, you do not try other channels from
> > this device and just go to the next one...
> 
> Which dma driver are you using?  The dmaengine code assumes that all
> channels on a device are equal.  It sounds like there are differences
> between peer-channels on the device in this case.  If the driver
> registers a device per channel that should give the flexibility you
> want.

I'm writing a new dma driver.  My DMAC has multiple channels and only
one channel is capable for generic memcpy and other channels have
fixed role.

Does new framework allow dma driver make only one channel public?
Or should I register two dma_device for DMA_MEMCPY and DMA_SLAVE?
Could you give me some advice?

---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/