Re: [PATCH, RFC] Remove fasync() BKL usage, take 3325

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 12:56:25 EST


On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:44:14AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> If others disagree, and using bitops is not an idea which will fly, I'd
> sure like to know sooner rather than later.

There are more than enough use cases that have large numbers of open
files (e.g. various high-end network servers). While it might not be
as sewer as for inodes I think it's really bad idea to do it for no
reason.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/