[PATCH 15/21] lockdep: merge the !_READ mark_lock_irq() helpers

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Jan 28 2009 - 09:03:46 EST


These two are also remakably similar

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 58 ++++++++++++++-----------------------------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2057,31 +2057,39 @@ static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit)
return state | (dir ^ 2);
}

+typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *,
+ enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *name);
+
static int
-mark_lock_irq_used_in(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
+mark_lock_irq_write(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
int new_bit)
{
const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);

int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
+ int dir = new_bit & 2;
+
+ check_usage_f usage = dir ?
+ check_usage_backwards : check_usage_forwards;

if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
return 0;
if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
return 0;
+
/*
* just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
* took no hardirq-unsafe lock in the past:
*/
- if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
+ if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
return 0;
#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
/*
* just marked it hardirq-safe, check that this lock
* took no hardirq-unsafe-read lock in the past:
*/
- if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
+ if (!usage(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
return 0;
#endif
if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
@@ -2125,40 +2133,6 @@ mark_lock_irq_read(struct task_struct *c
return 1;
}

-static int
-mark_lock_irq_enabled(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
- int new_bit)
-{
- const char *name = state_name(new_bit);
- const char *rname = state_rname(new_bit);
-
- int excl_bit = exclusive_bit(new_bit);
-
- if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit))
- return 0;
- if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + 1))
- return 0;
- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no hardirq-safe
- * lock in the system ever took it in the past:
- */
- if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit, name))
- return 0;
-#if STRICT_READ_CHECKS
- /*
- * just marked it hardirq-unsafe, check that no
- * hardirq-safe-read lock in the system ever took
- * it in the past:
- */
- if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit + 1, rname))
- return 0;
-#endif
- if (state_verbose(new_bit, hlock_class(this)))
- return 2;
-
- return 1;
-}
-
static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
{
@@ -2168,7 +2142,10 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
- return mark_lock_irq_used_in(curr, this, new_bit);
+ case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
+ case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
+ case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
+ return mark_lock_irq_write(curr, this, new_bit);

case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
@@ -2178,11 +2155,6 @@ static int mark_lock_irq(struct task_str
case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
return mark_lock_irq_read(curr, this, new_bit);

- case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
- return mark_lock_irq_enabled(curr, this, new_bit);
-
default:
WARN_ON(1);
break;

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/