Re: hardware time stamping with optional structs in data area

[Herbert Xu]

Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> True - at this time. But what if this extension mechanism turns out to
> be useful and we end up with more optional structures? I was hoping that
> this might be the case and thus tried to make it easy to add more
> structures.

You're putting the extension in the skb->end area, right?

How big are the time stamps? If they're not that big, why don't
we put it into the shinfo structure itself? For the common case,
we have plenty of space due to kmalloc padding anyway.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/