Re: [RT] [RFC] simple SMI detector

[Lee Revell]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 14:52 -0800, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>
>> Any reason why you could not do SMI detection in user level code running
>> at the highest RT priority?
>
> Yeah. I had some suggestions about that already...the problem with that
> is that you can't know whether measured latencies are due to SMIs /or/
> other kernel latencies - maybe there's a bug or other problem? I really
> want to be able to say to vendors "nope, it's definitely your problem".

Can't you do this with a known good version of the -rt kernel and the
latency tracer in full RT preempt mode?  SMI induced latency will show
up in the trace as long delays in random code paths where kernel
induced latency can be ruled out.

Lee
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/