Re: [RFC v2][PATCH]page_fault retry with NOPAGE_RETRY
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Jan 26 2009 - 18:57:48 EST
* Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think that a good way to present this is as a preparatory patch:
> "convert the fourth argument to handle_mm_fault() from a boolean to a
> flags word". That would be a simple do-nothing patch which affects all
> architectures and which ideally would break the build at any unconverted
> code sites. (Change the argument order?)
why not do what i suggested: refactor do_page_fault() into a platform
specific / kernel-internal faults and into a generic-user-pte function.
That alone would increase readability i suspect.
Then the 'retry' is multiple calls from handle_pte_fault().
Or something like that.
It looks wrong to me to pass another flag through this hot codepath, just
to express a property that the _highlevel_ code is interested in.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/