Re: [LLVMdev] inline asm semantics: output constraint width smaller than input

[Mike Stump]

On Jan 24, 2009, at 10:57 AM, Török Edwin wrote:
> With an unpatched LLVM I would also need weak attributes to be on the
> function type, instead of the return type,
> but I think thats an LLVM bug, and a one-line patch corrects it.

This is indeed a bug in llvm.  We'll find a way to get it fixed.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/