Re: lmbench lat_mmap slowdown with CONFIG_PARAVIRT

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tue Jan 20 2009 - 09:17:14 EST


On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:03:24PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > Times I believe are in nanoseconds for lmbench, anyway lower is
> > > better.
> > >
> > > non pv AVG=464.22 STD=5.56
> > > paravirt AVG=502.87 STD=7.36
> > >
> > > Nearly 10% performance drop here, which is quite a bit... hopefully
> > > people are testing the speed of their PV implementations against
> > > non-PV bare metal :)
> >
> > Ouch, that looks unacceptably expensive. All the major distros turn
> > CONFIG_PARAVIRT on. paravirt_ops was introduced in x86 with the express
> > promise to have no measurable runtime overhead.
>
> Here are some more precise stats done via hw counters on a perfcounters
> kernel using 'timec', running a modified version of the 'mmap performance
> stress-test' app i made years ago.
>
> The MM benchmark app can be downloaded from:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/mmap-perf.c

BTW. the lmbench test I run directly (it's called lat_mmap.c, and gets
compiled into a standalone lat_mmap exec by the standard lmbench build).


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/