Re: [PATCH 0/2] prefer wakers -v2
From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Fri Jan 16 2009 - 09:28:49 EST
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:39 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> OK, so lets try this again...
I took tip out for a little test-drive. Mysql/pgsql+oltp showed no
effect vs 29.git beyond noise level, but cache hot make -j8 kbuild times
in an nfs4 mount show marked improvement.
2.6.29.git
real 6m29.291s
user 10m20.355s
sys 2m1.288s
2.6.29.tip
real 4m30.160s
user 10m26.115s
sys 2m3.088s
Wire saturates at ~4m, so there's still some room for improvement.
On the interactivity front, tip feels snappier, particularly when IO is
going on. One place that this is quite noticeable is reading lkml with
evolution while building a new kernel. I generally keep thread count
low when using evolution because IO makes it sluggish when deleting and
moving on to the next message. With tip, the evolution experience is
much improved.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/