Re: [patch 42/94] [PATCH 11/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 01

[Pavel Machek]

> 2.6.28-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit 58fd3aa288939d3097fa04505b25c2f5e6e144d1 upstream.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

That does not make review exactly easy. Would it be possible to
inline upstream comment in the commit message?

...upstream commit message is empty :-(.

> -asmlinkage long
> -sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp)
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct timespec __user *, rqtp,
> +		struct timespec __user *, rmtp)
>  {
>  	struct timespec tu;
>  

Is it strictly neccessary to modify all the syscalls? 

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/