Re: [RFC][PATCH] NOOP cgroup subsystem

[KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki]

On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:45:02 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 18:20:45 -0800
> Matthew Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think
>   - Paul's suggestion sounds attractive. But I can't see fundamental differences
>     from user's side between "implemented as subsys" and "implemetned as cgroup's
>     feature". I feel it's easier for user's cgroup library to handle subsys rather
>     than "we can mount it anywhere, multiple times!".
>     Flexiblity doesn't means it's easy to use.
I should consider more....

mutiple mount point means that the process can belongs to multiple nickname
groups. oh yes, seems worth to try.


Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/