Re: deadlocks if use htb

[Jarek Poplawski]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 03:28:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
...
> Right, found all that...
> 
> Can't spot anything obviously wrong though.. hrtimer_start*() does
> remove_hrtimer() which checks STATE_ENQUEUED, STATE_PENDING and pulls it
> off the relevant list before it continues the enqueue.
> 
> However a loop in enqueue_hrtimer() would suggest a corrupted RB-tree,
> but I cannot find an RB-op that doesn't hold base-lock.
> 

I've revisited it yesterday, and if I don't miss something, there is
possible a scenario similar to this:

cpu1:				cpu2:

run_hrtimer_pending
spin_unlock
restart = fn(timer)

				hrtimer_start
				enqueue_hrtimer

				hrtimer_start
				remove_hrtimer
				(the HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK is removed)

				switch_hrtimer_base
spin_lock
(not this hrtimer's anymore)
__remove_hrtimer
list_add_tail			enqueue_hrtimer


Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/