Re: netlabel: UNLABELED ath9k not denying unlabeled traffic

[Justin P. Mattock]

Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 January 2009 4:35:25 pm Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>   
> > Anyways heres what I'm trying to achieve:
> >
> > default looks like this:
> > Configured NetLabel domain mappings(1)
> > domain: DEFAULT
> >     protocol: UNLABELED
> >
> > I want to try and have three of these for the
> > different types of media:
> > (in theory)
> > Configured NetLabel domain mappings(3)
> > domain:radio
> >    protocol: UNLABELED
> > domain:T.V.
> >    protocol: UNLABELED
> > domain:web
> >    protocol: UNLABELED
> > (and if possible three different tags(either 1,2,5), but probably can
> > only do that with cipsov4);
> >     
>
>   
apologize for the slow response
(had to do some external activities);
> Actually, in your case you are probably always going to want to send 
> network traffic without any labels attached to the packets (no labeled 
> IPsec or CIPSO) so you can stick with the default domain mapping 
> configuration which sends all packets "unlabeled".  The part you should 
> be concerned about is the static/fallback configuration which assigns 
> network peer labels to packets which do not have labels attached to 
> them by the remote host.
>   
sure would be nice to use ipsec/cipsov4 with a internet radio.
(lock down that tcp line);
I'll have to look into making sure I have static/fallback
configured correctly.
> NOTE: the domain mapping configuration only controls how outbound 
> network traffic is labeled on-the-wire; it "maps" the 
> LSM/SELinux "domains" to a specific labeling protocol configuration, 
> e.g. all apache_t traffic should be labeled with CIPSO DOI 3 while all 
> firefox_t traffic should not be labeled at all.
>
>   
> > heres what I've come up with so far:
> >
> > netlabelctl -p map del default
> >
> > netlabelctl unlbl add domain:radio interface:wlan0 address:<myadd>
> > label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
> > netlabelctl unlbl add domain:radio interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd>
> > label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
> >
> > netlabelctl unlbl add domain:T.V. interface:wlan0 address:<myadd>
> > label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
> > netlabelctl unlbl add domain:T.V. interface:wlan0 address:<t.v.add>
> > label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
> >     
>
> I think what you mean to type is the following:
>
>  # netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd> \
>        label:system_u:object_r:netlabel_peer_t:s0
>
> ... note there is no "domain" argument, that only exists 
> for "netlabelctl map ..." commands.
>
> NOTE: if you really want to get fancy you can create new SELinux domains 
> for each type of media and add NetLabel configurations for those new 
> domains.  Imagine you create a new "internet_radio_t" domain/type and 
> only allow the "netplayer_t" domain (yeah, I made that up but you get 
> the point) access to network traffic labeled with internet_radio_t.  
> You would then use the following command to label your incoming traffic 
> with NetLabel:
>
>  # netlabelctl unlbl add interface:wlan0 address:<radioadd> \
>        label:system_u:object_r:internet_radio_t:s0
>
> NOTE: you can also skip the "interface:wlan0" argument and just 
> use "default" instead if you want the configuration to apply to all 
> your network interfaces; although bear in mind that the "default" 
> configuration can be overridden by the interface specific 
> configurations.
>
>   
Alright, I thought you could use the map option for unlbl.

> > As for the new capabilities, I don't mind trying that out when
> > the time comes(but first I need to figure the this out before any
> > other ways);
> >     
>
> No problem, I understand.  Let me know if you have any more problems.
>
>   
> > here is what the error looks like:
> >
> > netlabel_tools-0.19# make
> > INFO: creating the version header file
> > .: 10: version_info: not found
> > make: *** [include/version.h] Error 2
> >     
>
> Huh, can you try the following:
>
>  1. Open the netlabel_tools-0.19/Makefile in your favorite editor
>  2. Change the ". version_info; \" line to "source ./version_info; \"
>  3. Save your changes
>  4. Try running "make" again
>
> Thanks.
>
>   
Thanks for the info,
Ill try this right away and let you know
if the package compiles.

regards;

Justin P. Mattock
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/