Re: [PATCH] x86: make 32bit MAX_HARDIRQSS_PER_CPU to be NR_VECTORS

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 16:38:33 EST


On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Impact: clean up to be same as 64bit
>>
>> 32bit is use per-cpu vector too, so don't use default NR_IRQS
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 4 ++--
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/hardirq_32.h
>> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ typedef struct {
>>
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(irq_cpustat_t, irq_stat);
>>
>> +/* We can have at most NR_VECTORS irqs routed to a cpu at a time */
>> +#define MAX_HARDIRQS_PER_CPU NR_VECTORS
>> +
>> #define __ARCH_IRQ_STAT
>> #define __IRQ_STAT(cpu, member) (per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).member)
>
> applied to tip/x86/cleanups. Btw., isnt the irq_vectors.h bit (mentioned
> in the diffstat) missing?
>

copy and modify the patch
forget to do quilt refresh --diffstat

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/