Re: [PULL -tip] fixed few make headers_check warnings

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

Hello Sam,

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >

>
> I appreciate your work but I will like to question the approach.

My approach was:
"PATCH should solve a problem per file", like:
 capability.h: extern's make no sense in userspace
 coda_psdev.h: extern's make no sense in userspace
 in6.h: extern's make no sense in userspace
 nubus.h: extern's make no sense in userspace
 socket.h: extern's make no sense in userspace

But this warnings was in many files:
 include of <linux/types.h> is preferred over <asm/types.h> : 15 files
 found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include <linux/types.h> : 52 files

So in place of making 15 + 52 = 67 patches, I made 2 patches for each warning.

> We should rather take the warnings as an indication that this
> file needs to be looked over and fix not only the warnings
> reported but rater to fix all the questionable issues on a file-by-file basis.

Should I make 67 patches ?

--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/