Re: [PATCH 08/10] MAINTAINERS - Add FTRACE git

[Frédéric Weisbecker]

2009/1/14 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Joe Perches wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 14:59 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:28:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > ---
>> > >  MAINTAINERS |    1 +
>> > >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> > > index ceeeb8c..6e051c3 100644
>> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> > > @@ -2189,6 +2189,7 @@ F:  fs/freevxfs/
>> > >  FTRACE
>> > >  P:       Steven Rostedt
>> > >  M:       rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > > +T:       git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git
>> > >  S:       Maintained
>> > >  F:       Documentation/ftrace.txt
>> > >  F:       arch/*/*/*/ftrace.h
>> >
>> > This sort of thing only makes sense if you include the topic branch for
>> > the tree in question. While it is true that ftrace development happens in
>> > this tree, people looking at ftrace may not want to sort through the
>> > hundreds of unrelated topic branches in the process. I say this as
>> > someone that does not want to sort through hundreds of unrelated topic
>> > branches in search of ftrace code ;-)
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=heads
>>
>> Is the correct topic branch for ftrace auto-ftrace-next?
>
> That is just a location that Ingo places changes that are ready to go to
> linux-next. Not where development is.
>
>>
>> maybe:
>>
>> T:    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git auto-ftrace-next
>>
>> No idea what's right here.  I had some private emails
>> with Steven Rostedt about a git tree.  He suggested
>> to use tip.
>>
>> Steven?  Suggestions?
>
> Ingo usually pulls ftrace related patches into the tracing/ftrace
> branch. That is for core ftrace. Since ftrace has a bunch of pluggins,
> they may have their own branches.
>
> But to answer Paul's question, I would suggest tracing/ftrace for
> seeing latest core ftrace changes.


But most of the time, all of these tracing/* topics are quickly merged
into tip/master.
Sometimes they are not because of a pending breakage but tip/master is
rarely more than a tiny bit out of sync against
tracing/ topics.
I guess tip/master is enough and good to base a work on, or to see the
latest changes in tracing.
No?


> Should we add another topic in MAINTAINERS? The "TRACE RING BUFFER"? or
> just call it ring_buffer? This is separate from ftrace, although ftrace
> uses it for on the fly tracing. I maintain it and it is located in the tip
> git repo under tracing/ring-buffer.
>
> -- Steve
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/