Re: [0/7] Distributed storage for drivers/staging merge request

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 04:40:29 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:20:08 +0300
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And while you at it, please shed a
light on this exports for POHMELFS:

--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ int add_to_page_cache_lru(struct page *page, struct address_space *mapping,
}
return ret;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_to_page_cache_lru);

OK by me.

#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
struct page *__page_cache_alloc(gfp_t gfp)
@@ -627,6 +628,7 @@ int __lock_page_killable(struct page *page)
return __wait_on_bit_lock(page_waitqueue(page), &wait,
sync_page_killable, TASK_KILLABLE);
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__lock_page_killable);

Needed for modular use of lock_page_killable() - makes sense.

Please maintain these alongside the pohmelfs patchset.

FWIW we definitely want pohmelfs in staging...

(yes, I realize we are discussing dst not pohmelfs)

Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/