Re: Minor kmemleak report via bdev_cache_init

[Cheng Renquan]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:25:34 +0000
> Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> wrote:


>
>> Hi Denis,
>>
>> With the commit c2acf7b908217 (fs/block_dev.c: __read_mostly improvement
>> and sb_is_blkdev_sb utilization), the bd_mnt is only local and kmemleak
>> reports the corresponding vfsmnt structure as unreferenced (together
>> with the duplicated name) since it can no longer track a valid pointer
>> to it:
>>
>> unreferenced object 0xdf813848 (size 128):
>>   comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294937384
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<c00872c0>] kmemleak_alloc+0x144/0x27c
>>     [<c00848c8>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x108/0x13c
>>     [<c009fc00>] alloc_vfsmnt+0x20/0x144
>>     [<c008bc34>] vfs_kern_mount+0x30/0xac
>>     [<c008bccc>] kern_mount_data+0x1c/0x20
>>     [<c00104a8>] bdev_cache_init+0x54/0x90
>>     [<c000fd7c>] vfs_caches_init+0xfc/0x128
>>     [<c0008984>] start_kernel+0x1f8/0x254
>> unreferenced object 0xdf8033d0 (size 32):
>>   comm "swapper", pid 0, jiffies 4294937384
>>   backtrace:
>>     [<c00872c0>] kmemleak_alloc+0x144/0x27c
>>     [<c0085e10>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x15c/0x194
>>     [<c0071704>] kstrdup+0x3c/0x58
>>     [<c009fc5c>] alloc_vfsmnt+0x7c/0x144
>>     [<c008bc34>] vfs_kern_mount+0x30/0xac
>>     [<c008bccc>] kern_mount_data+0x1c/0x20
>>     [<c00104a8>] bdev_cache_init+0x54/0x90
>>     [<c000fd7c>] vfs_caches_init+0xfc/0x128
>>     [<c0008984>] start_kernel+0x1f8/0x254
>>
>> Can this object be freed (as below) or should I just tell kmemleak to
>> ignore it (or is it referenced and that's a kmemleak false positive)?
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
>> index 349a26c..78e469c 100644
>> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
>> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
>> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ void __init bdev_cache_init(void)
>>       if (IS_ERR(bd_mnt))
>>               panic("Cannot create bdev pseudo-fs");
>>       blockdev_superblock = bd_mnt->mnt_sb;   /* For writeback */
>> +     free_vfsmnt(bd_mnt);
>>  }


>
> hm, yes, well, we might be able to get away with that - the kernel
> holds onto bd_mnt->mnt_sb for internal use for all time, but we don't
> directly use that vfsmount for anything after we've constructed
> blockdev_superblock.
>
> However there might well be things under blockdev_superblock which point
> back at this vfsmount - dunno, I didn't check.

I've checked that, the blockdev_superblock doesn't have a back pointer
to vfsmount indeed, and can never use vfsmount anymore, although
generally it needs more testing.

Acked-by: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>

To Al Viro: by this checking I found more vfsmount's not used, too, in
some other kern_mount'ed vfsmount, such as pipefs, sockfs, ipc mqueue,
selinux, smackfs, besides bdevfs, in such situations also only
superblock is used, the vfsmount only used as kern_mount and never
used anymore.
So maybe we can do some more cleanup. Patches will be sent later.

-- 
Denis, Cheng Renquan (çäå), Shenzhen, China
Bob Hope  - "I grew up with six brothers. That's how I learned to
dance - waiting for the bathroom."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/