Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard!

[David Rientjes]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

> Like anything that spawns a thread or process per request/client, or
> preallocates set of them which connect to the huge object like database.
> Most of the time database/server is killed first instead of comparably
> small clients.

No, the reverse is true: when a task is chosen for oom kill based on the 
badness heuristic, the oom killer first attempts to kill any child task 
that isn't attached to the same mm.  If the child shares an mm, both tasks 
must die before memory freeing can occur.

> In some cases it is possible to tune the environment, in
> others it is not that simple. This patch works for such situatons
> perfectly and does not require additional administrative burden, since
> it does not make thinge worse as a whole, but only better for the very
> commonly used cases, that's why I propose it for inclusion.
> 

It's an inappropriate addition since /proc/pid/oom_adj scores exist which 
can prefer or protect certain tasks over others when the oom killer 
chooses a target, including oom kill immunity.  These scores are inherited 
from parent tasks and can be tuned after the fork to your oom kill target 
preference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/