Re: Is 386 processor still supported?

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > So our minimal spec for SMP is probably 486DX + external Intel APIC.
> > 
> > In practice I doubt there is a single Intel APIC type 486 SMP box on the 
> > planet running Linux (or quite possibly running at all)
> 
> yeah, that's very likely true. I think we could eliminate some of the SMP 
> complications by requiring cmpxchg presence for CONFIG_SMP, agreed?

 I failed to track down a single 486 SMP system that would adhere to the 
MP spec.  There were and possibly still are APIC-based 486 SMP systems out 
there, but most likely they are not Intel MPS-compliant, by not providing 
the MP header at the very least.  Thus Linux would have to be ported and I 
gather the interest in doing so is epsilon.

 Myself, I could not resist trying an APIC-based 486 SMP box and possibly 
fixing issues if I found one and it was MPS-compliant, but nothing beyond 
that I would say.  Life's too short.

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/