Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:58:42PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> There is not just the cifs md5 one (which has been around a long
> time), but an md5_init (static) in crypto and the new one in rt.  The
> addition of the new one (rt md5_init) causes the build problem.   It
> would be nice if we could use the same md5 routines though ... last
> time we checked the crypto one was not well suited for calculating
> signatures as a network fs would do though.

I'll fix up the staging rt drivers to not do this, but cifs shouldn't be
declaring such functions as globals either :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/