Re: Does CONFIG_PARAVIRT imply usage of byte locks?

[Avi Kivity]

Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Avi, are there any plans to make KVM use byte locks implementation for 
> spinlocks in the near future?
>   

No, although I note anything coming out of the spinning mutex discussion 
could be applied towards a sleeping spinlock for paravirt.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/