Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include

[Ingo Molnar]

* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:04:28 +0100
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:55:27 +0100
> > > Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > * Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:10 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Patch is against Jeremy's Xen patch queue which is based on a pre-Xmas
> > > > > > tip tree so fairly out of date, I hope it is somewhat useful though.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Here's a version again tip-latest, only compile tested though since my
> > > > > testing relies on the Xen dom0 patch queue.
> > > > 
> > > > Applied them to tip/core/iommu:
> > > > 
> > > >  961d7d0: swiotlb: do not use sg_virt()
> > > >  0b8698a: swiotlb: range_needs_mapping should take a physical address.
> > > 
> > > I think that Xen camp wants these changes for 2.6.29. Are you trying to 
> > > push tip/core/iommu for 2.6.29?
> > 
> > Yet unclear, depends on testing. Will probably wait for 2.6.30 though.
> 
> Thanks, I see. Probably, it will get tons of conflict due to the dma API 
> unification touching everywhere.
>
> BTW, what happened to?
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125853906986&w=2

it's in -rc1.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/