Re: [RFC][PATCH] NOOP cgroup subsystem

From: Li Zefan
Date: Fri Jan 09 2009 - 01:16:08 EST


KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> How about this idea ? Any comments are welcome.
>
> -Kame
>
> ==
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add an NO OPERATION cgroup subsystem.
>
> Cgroup itself is providing a feature to attach a task(PID) to some class.
> This feature itself is very useful but "no operation" cgroup is not supported
> now other than debug cgroup. (But debug cgroup should be for DEBUG. distro
> may not configure it.)
>

Then how can we make sure distro will configure this noop subsys. :)

Or we can make the debug subsys always configured if CONFIG_CGROUP=y ?
The debug system adds no runtime overhead, and it's about 100 lines
of code only.

> Motivation: Simply classify Applications by cgroup
> When using cgroup for classifying applications, some kind of "control" or
> "account" subsys must be used. For flexible use of cgroup's nature of
> classifying applications, NOOP is useful. It can be used regardless of
> resource accounting unit or name spaces or some controls.
> IOW, NOOP cgroup allows users to tie PIDs with some nickname.
>
> After this, application can be checked whether it's still alive or not by
>
> mount -t cgroup none /var/apps noop
> mkdir /var/apps/mydaemon
> echo 0 > /var/apps/mydaemon
> /etc/init.d/mydaemon start
> exit
>
> This can be used as the same technique of "recording pid into /var/run/xxx.pid"
> and not necessary to remove stale files. If mydaemon dies, tasks file will
> be empty and notify_on_release handler can be used.
>
> I myself want to use this for replacement of "ps -elf | grep" if libcgroup supports
> ps under cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/