Re: Is 386 processor still supported?

[Sam Ravnborg]

On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:27:13PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 15:21 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > > > Subject: x86: make spinlocks available on machines without xadd insn
> > > > Current kernel wouldn't compile on ancient x86 machines that don't support 
> > > > xadd instruction, as ticket spinlocks implementation unconditionally uses 
> > > > it.
> > > > On machines without CONFIG_X86_XADD, use old-style byte spinlock 
> > > > implementation instead.
> > > afaik we don't support i386-smp and up spinlocks are trivial
> > > preempt_disable() calls.
> > 
> > Hmm. Where in Kconfig is SMP for M386 not allowed?
> 
> Dunno, kconfig is too much of a jungle for a simple person like me ;-)

Kconfig for x86 does nothing to prevent us from selecting SMP
when we have selected the 386 processor variant.

But then you need to enable the CONFIG_EXPERT(*) option to
select CPU type - which imply you know what you are doing.

(*) Named CONFIG_EMBEDDED for some reason.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/