Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans

From: Dave Chinner
Date: Tue Jan 06 2009 - 21:17:17 EST


On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 06:22:08PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:08:55PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Btw, this code is still not quite right. We really need to call
> > > ->setattr instead of vmtruncate here. Complex filesystem need
> > > transaction to properly free blocks, and those transactions are in
> > > ->setattr not inside vmtruncate where ->truncate doesn't even have
> > > a chance to get the handle to the transaction passed.
> > >
> > > As these patches don't make it worse this is not a NACK, but more of
> > > a heads up.
> >
> > Sure. Maybe add a FIXME comment for now?
>
> Ok. I was planning to look into this again, and IIRC Dave already did
> when he was at SGI, but his proof of concept patches got lost somewhere.

Hmmmm - I think I posted the "it works for XFs but nothing else" POC
patches to fsdevel when I first found this....

<rummage>

http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=120952722315259&w=2

The thread starts here for those that want the whole story:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=120946361527726&w=2

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/